Pro: The interest of society in preserving itself is superior to the interest of individuals in conducting sexual activity. Interventions by authorities to restrict or control sexual activities that are likely to spread disease in sex clubs aim at protecting the public health.
Con: Authorities may use laws aimed at protecting the public health to control activities that they consider immoral. The abridgement of human rights-especially gay rights-may garner public support when it occurs under the banner of preserving human life.
Con: Everyone has an interest in protecting society from the spread of disease. But attempts forcibly to prevent sexual activity in sex clubs will not be effective in curbing the spread of disease. Education and training are far more effective than the use of severe restrictions.